Bank of Credit and Commercial International Case Study
Explanation & Answer length: 3000 Words
Case study topic: Bank of Credit and Commercial International Research for case study Identify the ethical issue posed by the case and collect background information on this issue from the relevant resources. In particular, RESEARCH the following aspects in lieu of your case: a) past; how the issue has been handled by philosophers and media people in the b) ethical concerns, such as bias, truth, justice, fairness, economic considerations c) EDM models; d) stakeholder impact theories e) legal considerations; f) professional considerations; g) code of corporate Governance; h) professional codes; i) code of ethics; and j) Opinions of experts in the field. Case Study Report Prepare a detailed report analyzing the chosen case.
Reports should be 3,000 words (excluding table of contents, bibliography and references), double-spaced typewritten, with graphs and illustrations, if necessary. Your report must contain the following elements:
i. ii. Company Introduction Disaster Triggers
iii. Timeline of events
iv. Consequences of failure
v. Analysis of stock prices and investor confidence before and after the eventual demise
vi. Analysis of financial statements
vii. Key missing Governance pieces
viii. ix. x. Company’s ethical culture Lessons to be learnt Current affairs of the company (if still in business).
xi. Emerging impacts and trends from the fiascos.
xiii. References. General Instructions & Format: 1) The word limit for this assignment is 3,000 words (+/- 10%); excluding graphs and tables.
. You are expected to support your work with sources from the literature and use Harvard referencing style as appropriate, in text and in the list of references at the end of your assignment. 6) Format: a. Font: Times New Roman b. Use double spacing and sufficient margins (3-4 cm) c. Headings & subheadings font size: 14 points; the rest of the text: 12 points d. All pages should be numbered; include a table of content. Grading: • This report will be marked out of 40 marks (40% of your final grade) based on the attached grading scheme. Please read the marking rubric with care. Grading Scheme Category Grade Primary Marking Criteria Secondary Marking Criteria · Exceeds expectations for most primary criteria Outstanding Excellent Distinction · Comprehensive knowledge · Complete command of subject and other relevant areas ·
Proper Harvard style referencing · Ideas/arguments are highly original · Detailed understanding of the subject area · Exceeds expectations for some primary criteria · Extensive background study · Complete command of subject · Highly focused answer and well structured · Ideas/arguments are highly original · Logically presented and defended arguments 70% and over Good · No factual/computational errors · Original interpretation · New links between topics are developed · New approach to a problem Meets requirements of Class · Excellent presentation with very accurate communication Merit Strong knowledge Mid-Level · Command of subject but with minor gaps in knowledge · Ideas/arguments are mostly original · Meets most but not all primary criteria · Command of subject but with some gaps in knowledge · Exceeds expectations for some primary criteria · Proper Harvard style referencing ·
Command of subject but with gaps in knowledge · Understands most but not all of the subject area · Some ideas/arguments are original · Evidence of background study 60-69% Meets all primary criteria · Ideas/arguments are mostly original · Good · · Focused answer with good structure · Arguments presented coherently · Meets all primary criteria · Strong factual knowledge and understanding · Ideas/arguments are well presented but few are original Category Grade Meets requirements of Class Primary Marking Criteria Secondary Marking Criteria · Mostly free of factual/computational errors · Meets most but not all primary criteria · Some limited original interpretation ·
Strong factual knowledge with minor weaknesses in understanding · Well known links between topics are described · Problems addressed by existing methods/approaches · Most but not all ideas/arguments are well presented, and few are original · Good presentation with accurate communication Good within the Class · Knowledge of key areas/principles only · Exceeds expectations for some primary criteria · Weak Harvard style referencing · Moderate factual knowledge with several weaknesses in understanding · Weaknesses in understanding of the subject area ·
Limited evidence of background study Pass Mid-Level · Answer only poorly focussed on question and with some irrelevant material and poor structure · Arguments presented but lack coherence 40-49% · Several factual/computational errors · No original interpretation · Only major links between topics are described Meets requirements of Class · Limited problem solving · Many weaknesses in presentation and accuracy · A few ideas/arguments are presented but with weaknesses · Matches all primary criteria · Limited factual knowledge with several weaknesses in understanding ·
Very few ideas/arguments are presented · Matches most but not all primary criteria · Limited factual knowledge with many weaknesses in understanding · Very few ideas/arguments are presented and with errors in logic/presentation · For PGT - Insufficient to fulfil the associated learning outcomes Fail 0-39% Good within the Class · Insufficient to fulfil the associated learning outcomes · Exceeds expectations for most primary criteria · No evidence of knowledge/understanding Category Grade Primary Marking Criteria Secondary Marking Criteria · Poor Harvard style referencing · Only limited evidence of an attempt to answer the question · No evidence of relevant knowledge or understanding ·
No evidence of background study Mid-Level · Answer relies on irrelevant material and lacks a coherent structure · No arguments presented or arguments are not relevant to the assessment · Many factual/computational errors · No attempt at interpretation Meets requirements of Class · No links between topics are described · No attempt to solve problems or to address the assessment brief · The presentation is very weak containing many inaccuracies · Exceeds expectations for some primary criteria · No evidence of knowledge/understanding · Very limited evidence of an attempt to answer the question · Matches all primary criteria · No evidence of knowledge/understanding and/or evidence of misunderstanding · No attempt to answer/address the question
Do you have a similar assignment and would want someone to complete it for you? Click on the ORDER NOW option to get instant services at EssayBell.com